War, without a doubt, is one of the most terrible trials that can befall a person. Nothing brings so much misfortune, so much sorrow and suffering, as their wars bring. From petty tribal skirmishes to the cataclysmic conflicts of the 20th century, they have haunted humanity throughout history. In addition to the enormous risk to life, war is also the hardest test of the human psyche. To remain a man at the front, when comrades are dying around him every day, or in the rear, when you constantly live in fear for your loved ones, afraid to receive a fatal letter from the front - only a truly strong-willed person can withstand this. I believe that the consequentialist principle "all means are fair in war" is a fundamentally wrong view of the world, especially in the conditions of real military operations.
Talking about the war, it is hard not to recall one of the greatest works of Russian and world literature - "War and Peace" by L.
Our experts can check your essay by USE criteria
Site experts Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
N. Tolstoy. Tolstoy's ideas of non-violence made a huge contribution to Russian philosophy, and were also reflected in the characters of many of the heroes of this work. Supreme manifestation moral qualities and philanthropy is an episode in which Natasha Rostova, a man with extremely wealthy inner world, in tears, persuades his parents to give all the carts that were at the disposal of the Rostov family to the wounded soldiers, who otherwise would have faced inevitable death in French captivity. In this scene, the goal is to evacuate Moscow at the lowest possible cost, but to achieve this goal, the Rostovs would have to refuse help to the soldiers. This did not happen only thanks to Natasha, who was able to convince the whole family and dispose of the carts fairly.
We meet another episode, incredibly difficult for both the reader and the characters, in the epic novel Quiet Flows the Don by Mikhail Sholokhov. Here, the heroes face an even more difficult test - a civil, "fratricidal" war. Ilya Bunchuk is an example of a person who is ready to do anything for the sake of the party and the "fight against the bourgeois system." He is engaged in agitation at the front, preparing militias in the rear, making every effort to suppress the white movement. However, even he is unable to withstand the work of the commandant of the revolutionary tribunal. After a week of constant executions of the White Guards, Bunchuk's psyche was finally shaken. He suddenly realized what a terrible sin he had committed, "bringing the revolution to the masses." The death of his beloved finally breaks him: death for him becomes a happy occasion, deliverance from suffering.
Thus, on the example of two different works, we were convinced that, in spite of any circumstances, the most important thing is to maintain basic moral guidelines and not turn from a man into a beast. I would like to finish with a quote from a textbook on philosophy: “A person who violates fundamental moral principles undoubtedly acts against himself, since he destroys his psyche due to the constant conflict of consciousness and subconsciousness. He cannot avoid this conflict, even if he convinces himself that he does not care about high morality.
Updated: 2017-09-25
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
End justifies the means
End justifies the means
From Latin: Finis sanctificat media (finis sanctificat media).
It is traditionally accepted that these words belong to the famous Italian thinker, historian and statesman Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), author of the well-known treatises The Sovereign and Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius. But this is a mistake - there is no such expression in the creative heritage of this outstanding political scientist of the Middle Ages.
In fact, this saying belongs to the Jesuit Eekobar and is the motto of the Jesuit order and, accordingly, the basis of their morality (see: Velikovich L. N. The Black Guard of the Vatican. M., 1985).
Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. - M.: "Lokid-Press". Vadim Serov. 2003 .
End justifies the means
The idea of this expression, which is the basis of the morality of the Jesuits, was borrowed by them from the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who in his book On the Citizen (1642) wrote: Since it is useless for someone who is denied the right to use the necessary means, and the right to strive for the goal, it follows that since everyone has the right to self-preservation, then everyone has the right to use all means and perform any deed, without which he is not able to protect myself". The Jesuit Father Herman Buzenbaum in his essay "Fundamentals of Moral Theology" (1645) wrote: " To whom the end is permitted, the means are also permitted.".
Dictionary of winged words. Plutex. 2004
See what "The end justifies the means" is in other dictionaries:
- "The end justifies the means" catchphrase, originally owned by Niccolò Machiavelli Il fine giustifica i mezzi. This expression is found in a number of authors: The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588 1679) The German theologian Herman ... Wikipedia
Adverb, number of synonyms: 3 the game is worth the candle (6) the game is worth the candle (6) ... Synonym dictionary
End justifies the means- wing. sl. The idea of this expression, which is the basis of the morality of the Jesuits, was borrowed by them from the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588 1679), who wrote in the book “On the Citizen” (1642): “Since the one who is denied the right to apply the necessary ... ... Universal optional practical Dictionary I. Mostitsky
end justifies the means- about the justification of immoral ways to achieve goals. Tracing paper from Italian. Authorship is attributed to the writer and politician of Italy N. Machiavelli. This idea was expressed by him in the essay "The Sovereign" (1532). Similar thoughts are... Phraseology Handbook
Razg. On the justification of immoral ways to achieve goals. BMS 1998, 612 ... Big Dictionary Russian sayings
The problem expressed in the well-known maxim "The end justifies the means" and is associated with the value aspect of the relationship between C. and S. and, accordingly, with the choice and evaluation of means in expedient activity. Regarding the solution to this problem in the popular ... Philosophical Encyclopedia
The goal is an image of the desired future, the ideal result that political subjects strive for, which is the motive for activity. The goal in politics, in addition to motivational, also fulfills organizational, mobilization ... ... Political science. Dictionary.
Wed There are many means to get rid of it... The goal sanctifies the means... Our Brotherhood allows Us in cases like this To resort to a dagger or poison. Gr. A. Tolstoy. Don Juan. 1. Wed. Some Jesuits say that every remedy is good, as long as ... ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary
Adverb, number of synonyms: 3 the game is not worth the candle (11) inappropriate (14) ... Synonym dictionary
One of the elements of behavior and consciousness. human activity, which characterizes the anticipation in thinking of the result of the activity and the way of its implementation with the help of the definition. funds. C. acts as a way of integrating various actions ... ... Philosophical Encyclopedia
Books
- The end justifies the means, Eugene Monakh. The end justifies the means - says the leader of the criminal group Monk. And if so, then any methods are good. Including the dirtiest - murder, bribery, blackmail. Monk's competitors...
Introduction: What can be worse than war for humanity? Terrible, of course, natural disasters, and epidemics, but they do not depend on human will. War is the concentration of hatred and anger in the people, their destructive outburst. How much grief and tears it brings, how many human lives it takes, how many destinies it destroys!
It is terrible that innocent people, civilians and children are dying. Our people had to endure many wars, but the First World War, Civil War and Second World War were especially destructive and cruel. world war. Many writers, both Russian and foreign, addressed this topic. They condemn the war, its stinking breath, they talk about its perniciousness. But it also happens, as in a patriotic war - an enemy has come, you need to defend your homeland. War is inevitable. Are all means good? What is possible in war, what is not?
Arguments: Leo Tolstoy in the epic story "War and Peace" shows the illusory nature of military glory. Andrei Bolkonsky, having come into contact with the abomination of war, understands its inhumanity. As a person with high moral principles, he considers not every means justified. Napoleon, on the other hand, goes to glory, covering the road with the corpses of soldiers.
Tragic moment from civil war pulled out by Mikhail Sholokhov. Ilya Bunchuk seeks to defeat the bourgeoisie at any cost, believing that in war all means are good. His reprisals against the opponents of the revolution are extremely cruel. But the price turned out to be too expensive for him - Ilya lost his mind. The highest value on earth is human life. The death of a person is equivalent to the death of the whole universe. You can not take the life of your own kind and remain without punishment.
War awakens and reveals low human feelings, the animal fear of death often becomes the cause of betrayal and betrayal. A striking example of this is Alexei Shvabrin from The Captain's Daughter by Pushkin. The fear of death makes him a traitor, there is nothing left in him worthy of the title of a nobleman and just a man.
Unnecessarily, the United States detonated nuclear bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to assert their positions. Many civilians were killed, including children. There is no justification for this kind of warfare; nothing threatened the life of the American people. This is just a sadistic reprisal of the winner over the vanquished, the strong over the weak.
Great Patriotic War the Soviet people with Nazi Germany left us horrendous welts and scars as a memory of how horrific the means of warfare can be. Mass extermination of the population, concentration camps, burned villages, young people taken prisoner, looting and violence - these are the means. Who will return the ruined lives of young people, will collect the shed tears of widows, mothers, orphans? Who has the power to do this? IN Soviet army reprisals against the civilian population, looting were forbidden, there was a high military discipline. For me personally, this is a sign of moral and ethical superiority.
Conclusion: There are inevitable wars when our consent is not asked. Often our people had to wage wars of liberation, and the main thing in war is to be able to remain human. Massacres against the civilian population, especially cruel methods of conducting military operations are unacceptable. Above all, human life should be valued.
In this war, the rivalry of the clans became especially acute. The appearance of fighting clans, their prestige, and, especially, their control over the territories have led to the fact that the clans are ready to wrest victory from each other at a high price. But at what cost?
Someone takes organization and coherence, intra-clan work and strengthening morale. And someone...
Today our own investigation members of the clans Elfius and Titans will be subjected!
At the beginning of the war, the Far Far Away Kingdom and the Horde fought for leadership in the clan standings. But then the Titans unexpectedly overtook and overtook all the clan, and now they are increasing their advantage. And Elfius is not far behind. What is the secret of their success? In coordinated work? But with an equal number, it is extremely difficult to win back 10 million from the Horde and Far Away in a few days, and in the same Far Away and the Horde, the organization is also not lame. Both in Elphius and in the Titans, they found a way out - to bypass the rules set for BC. Why fight on equal terms when these conditions can be improved!
The principle works simply - "mercenaries" are accepted. After 7 battles, on the same day, the "mercenaries" are immediately expelled and others are taken in, and so on. That is, with the number of clans at each moment of time being the same 250 people, up to 300 people can fight for the clan per day!
That is, the overlap over other clans is about 10-20%. (Titans for 2.5 last days- 27 "receptions-deductions", and the elfius has about 130!). And sometimes this advantage is enough to snatch victory for a sector on the flag, for each of which all clans throw their best forces!
I know people who did not sleep at night, sitting in the world or Skype, spending their energy on organizing in order to capture and hold sectors in an incredible struggle. And sometimes they lacked quite a bit!
Yes, in other clans, the process of expelling old clanmates and accepting new ones is also underway, but this is a work routine, and not a planned, purposeful policy. Yes, and they try to take on a permanent basis, for a long time - and not for one day.
And others simply throw away a lot of money, creating an advantage of a different kind! What do you feel sorry for other people's money? Are you jealous? - say in these clans. We have found a way that no one has forbidden to gain an advantage over others - and, perhaps, they will be right in their own way.
Perhaps this is not a violation in the letter, but in spirit? Is it in the spirit of a fair fight? We do not know - and let the readers express their opinion with their comments!
When fighting clans appeared, the administration clearly spelled out the condition - 250 people in a fighting clan. For what? Obviously - to create clans equal conditions in the struggle for the palm, so that the most organized and friendly clan could win in this struggle. The clan where each person could show their best qualities in the team.
But, apparently, many, having found a loophole, decided to use it. And many said - no, we want to fight honestly. And they did not start to drive "pseudo-mercenaries" into the clan in order to achieve an advantage over others, which, in fact, should not be!
Is this a violation? From a fair play point of view, no doubt! From the point of view of the laws of the GVD, it is debatable, since the charter for military clans contains only the final limit on the number of clans. And what principles of playing the game to adhere to is already the business of each clan and its head personally.
And what do members and heads of other martial clans think about this problem? What do you think - does the strategy with an invitation for several hours to the clan of "mercenaries" have the right to life? I would like to emphasize once again that the editors expressed their opinion, based on the ethics of the world of the GVD, and having talked with the heads and members of several clans. The editorial board does not pretend to be a judge and the ultimate truth, and even more so does not want to pronounce a guilty verdict!
Dear players - members and heads of other military clans, do not stand aside, speak out on the pages of our newspaper!
One of the members of the clan Elfius (Skilord) decided to express his opinion on the above. We also give the opinion of the Titans clan.
Opinion Skilord (Elfius).
In my response to the article "All means are good in war", I would like to show arguments in opposition to what was said in it.
I will make a reservation right away that I am for the prohibition of rotation, because this is not correct in principle. But…
I was confused by the naming of the victory of the clans who made the rotation - dishonest. The rules of war were set by the administrators:
1. Limitation of 250 people - at the same time.
2. 4500 - for accepting a new clan member.
3. 7 battles of one clan member.
4. Points are credited for battles fought under the sign of the clan!
Not a single rule was violated during the war, rotations were not prohibited. Some clans have decided to use this opportunity to achieve their goals. After all, the end justifies the means. And this technique is no worse than the method of gathering people of 13+ lvl into a clan, for example.
Saying rotation is a bug. A priori incorrect. We do not have a battle of psychics, and we do not know what the admins are up to. Yes, rotation is an oversight of this war, but to say that this is not honest is not correct. Everything was within the rules and assumptions.
I will also add. Rotation was and is available to all clans. If you do not like the method, then do not talk about its dishonesty. It's like saying we don't like crowds high level, let's limit the number of highs in clans.
The opinion of the Titans clan.
In the last few days, there have been a lot of inductions in the Titans clan and a lot of exclusions from the clan. Let me explain what it is.
It's simple - people were excluded by activity and level, so that instead of them they would come, those who could bring more points to the clan. Regarding the "rotations" there were 4 entrances and exits along own will and initiative, the rest, excuse me, far-fetched.