To ensure the right to objective assessment, the USE participant has the right to file in writing (i.e., a complaint) about:

violation of the established order conducting the exam;

disagreement with the scores.

Appeals will not be accepted:

on the content and structure of KIM;

on issues related to the violation by the USE participant of the established requirements for the implementation examination work.

Appeals are considered by specially created for this territorial conflict commissions.

The terms and procedure for the work of the conflict commission, its composition and powers are established by the local (municipal) education authority and brought to the attention of graduates, their parents (legal representatives), teachers and directors of educational institutions no later than 2 weeks before the start of the state (final) certification.

Appeal for violation of the procedure for conducting the exam

Rules for filing an appeal about violation of the established procedure for conducting the exam:

an appeal about a violation of the established procedure (procedure) for conducting the exam is filed before the exit of the exam participant from the examination point (hereinafter referred to as the PES);

to file an appeal about a violation of the established procedure for conducting the exam, the exam participant must receive two copies of the application form from the authorized representative of the territorial examination commission in the PES or from the responsible organizer in the audience and fill them out;

the completed applications are submitted by the USE participant to the authorized representative of the territorial examination commission in the PES;

an authorized representative of the territorial examination commission in the PES accepts the application and certifies it with his signature, after which one copy of the application is transferred to the exam participant;

consideration of the appeal by the conflict commission is carried out within two working days (including Saturday) from the moment of its filing;

if the appeal of violation of the established procedure for conducting the exam is satisfied, the current result of the exam participant in the relevant subject will be canceled and the participant will be given the opportunity to retake the exam in this subject in the traditional form.

Appeal for disagreement with points

Within 2 business days of the official announcement of the results, you need to come to your school and prepare a package of documents for registering you as a participant in the appeal. You need to bring with you the notice with which you went to the exam. This is a form with the stamp of your school and the signature of the person in charge, which contains all necessary information(exam date, your personal data, code educational organization, registration code, PES number and address educational institution where you passed the exam). School staff will help you complete all forms.

After registering for the appeal, you will be told where and when the procedure will take place. Be sure to carefully study all the answer forms that you download from personal account, for technical errors or controversial points in the verification and scoring. Parents and legal guardians, as well as other representatives of the student, may be present at the appeal by law. This means that you can issue a notarized power of attorney for a teacher or tutor and take it with you to the appeal. The test part is not considered for the appeal, drafts are not taken into account, so be sure to plan your line of defense with the teacher the day before. This is a guarantee of a good result on the appeal.

The deadline for filing appeals about disagreement with the points set for the main stage of the Unified State Examination in 2019

Rules for filing an appeal for disagreement with the points:

This year there were no scandals related to the leakage of KIMs before the Unified State Examination, there were relatively few cases of cheating, but the number of complaints about the procedure and the essence of the appeal about disagreement with exam scores increased significantly. The Pedagogical Council collected some of the most revealing stories about how the appeals took place.

Why is the appeal of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language a scam?

1. The deadline for filing an appeal is limited to two days. If you are working, then you will not have time to prepare for it.
2. You are not shown KIMs (tasks), including the text on which the essay is written.
3. It is not allowed to check the test and the correctness of the assignments (meanwhile, there are errors and incorrectly composed assignments in the FIPI database).
4. You are not allowed to get acquainted with the full package of documents for the exam. They give the child separate pieces of paper to sign and do not give time to familiarize themselves with them.
Documents are not bound. Aunts rush about with a pile of papers. You can lose or replace any of them after the fact.
5. There are no expert edits in the essay, so it is difficult to challenge them. Crazed experts of the conflict commission are sometimes not even able to read the text carefully, so they prefer to intimidate the child and parents, or they blatantly lie and talk nonsense, pointing to "mistakes" where there are none.
6. You are not allowed to add written explanations or a reasoned appeal to the case. They are afraid of this like fire.
7. Limit time to 15-20 minutes.
8. You will not know the names of the experts. They are anonymous.
10. Turmoil and confusion are specially created, hundreds of people pass through the CC in one day. There is no required number of rooms. Several CCs sit in the same class.
11. You are constantly shouted at, threatening to withdraw the points already set.
12. It is impossible to get through to the hotline of Rosobrnadzor.

Appellant can't do anything

This year, my husband and I took the exam in history as graduates of previous years.

My husband was given very low scores, completely unreasonably. He went to appeal, preparing to defend his position all evening. But it turned out that the appellant could not influence anything: the commission rechecked the work in advance and recorded the results in the minutes. The appellant comes simply to ask the commission for his or her result in person. As a result, he was given 3 points - they were completely incompetently removed at the first check. But the fourth disputed score was not given to him and they could not explain why. Allegedly, there was a factual error in the essay. No matter how much the husband asked to point out this mistake to him, the commission could not do this. They pulled some wording by the ears, just to answer something. Suspecting a violation of the rules, after the appeal, the husband called the federal hotline of Rosobrnadzor, and they confirmed that the appellant could not influence the recheck in any way, no one needed his evidence. So the presence of a parent, teacher or tutor is needed only for psychological support. And the presence of the student himself is not clear why.

The points were not returned to us, although the evidence was reinforced concrete

Our conversation went something like this:
- The topic in task 15 is covered well, but we will not return the score, because it was possible to start with the biographical data of the poet.
— No, it was impossible. Replacing a lyrical hero with a biographical author is one of the biggest mistakes in the Unified State Exam in literature.
- Hmm ... But then look, she wrote that the poet must remain real. I should have said "true", this is a factual error.
There is no mistake, these are synonymous words.
— Um… Look how bad the handwriting is. You will probably find some spelling mistakes.
- There are no spelling errors.
- If you want, you can still find something.

When you come, everything is already decided

This year I took the exam in my subjects, out of interest. I went to the appeal, like a fool preparing her defense strategy all evening, and I was just as simply introduced to the results of the revision of my work. On the hotline of Rosobrnadzor they said that this is the order and everything went without violations. So, alas, yes - preparing for an appeal is pointless. When you come, everything has already been decided, the protocols have been signed.

Wrong because it's wrong

Today I visited the appeal for the Unified State Examination in social studies. There, administrative law does not work, there, as we were told, "educational law." They would be for advanced training ... So, the news:
1. Information and post-industrial society are one and the same.
2. The US is not a democracy.
3. There are two post-industrial countries in the world - Japan and the USA.
4. Economic growth cannot be defined as a stage of the economic cycle.

The procedure is not transparent, the conflict of interest has not been eliminated, the regulations establish only the general procedure, all "particulars" are at the discretion of the Chairman. Arguments on questions are not allowed. The result of the appeal is already known (!) at the time of entering the office and it is actually read out. Imagine, really... You come, they just tell you the result... and that's all... It doesn't matter that none of them understand what GDP is! And yes, by the way, note that GDP is the volume of production. Urgently change the SNA and textbooks. And call Rosstat, otherwise they don't know.

In the morning, Professor Polyakova was there, and by lunchtime she began to "listen, mommy." This is a complete sham. And after that the question is: who teaches our children and what. After all, I would venture to suggest that not the worst teachers sit on the commission. From the need to comply with the Law on Personal Data, I do not post the names of the heroes.

How Krasnodar violated the USE appeal

This year I finished 11th grade and passed the exam. I was not pleased with the result in literature - only 69 points. What to do in this case? You can either put up with it and enter the university for commerce, or file an appeal about disagreement with the results, which I did. I will say right away that everyone intimidated us by deducting points for work, that it is better not to submit anything anywhere. They didn't deduct points, but they didn't add them either. But the procedure itself was treated like a pig.

1. I went to the head teacher of my school and filled out an appeal form. Here it was important to choose whether I will be present at the consideration of my work / the work will be considered without me / my legal representative will be present instead of me. I chose the first one, i.e. my work was to be rechecked TOGETHER with me. After that, I took the form for signature to the director and began to wait for the date when I would need to take the form to the education center.

a) It is written on the Internet that the form should have been in two copies. I was given one and had no problems with it.

2. I came for identification. I looked through the sheets, signed the paper for the correctly scanned first part and the integrity of my work. This is where the first call came in. I asked the woman what time I needed to arrive for the appeal. At first she hesitated: "The results will be reported to you by phone." But when I insisted, it turned out that at 14:00 the meeting would take place in assembly hall where I am also invited. With that we said goodbye.

3. I came to the meeting. The hall was full of graduates with their parents. Experts were sitting on the sides, and on the stage - 10 people were sitting at a huge table, "Big U" (managers).

So, this is where things get interesting. I thought that I would defend my innocence, they would raise my points and I would enter my faculty without any problems. But no. The main woman (alas, I don’t remember her name) told all of us sitting in the hall: “Your work has already been checked. Now we will announce your results. If you have any questions, you can ask them to the experts, but your scores will not change” .

I won't tell how nicely we had a talk with a female expert about romanticism in V. Soloukhin's poem or about how happy 3 girls were, who out of 20-30 present got a higher score. I will tell you why I am writing about this here and ask for your help. Now there is such a thing as the "Internet" (yes, yes), so I talked to people who were on appeal in other cities. They called the CIRCUS what was happening in our city. Firstly, I was not allowed to sign a document stating that I agreed with the outcome of the appeal. Those. it was like she didn't exist. Secondly, as you remember, I decided to PERSONALLY be present at the appeal, which means that my work should have been checked with me, in a separate audience (perhaps without me, but there should have been a private meeting) and only after that scores should be given (as it was done in other cities).

I and others were simply put before a fact, thereby violating the procedure for the appeal. If someone knows where and how to write a complaint in this case - please unsubscribe in the comments, my future and the future of other graduates depend on it. With the help of Internet resources, a fake medalist was recently exposed, do not let this be silenced. I may be wrong about something, but here I told about everything I know, about everything that I was informed about.

The Pedagogical Council failed to find the appellant, who this year managed to increase his score by more than 3 primary as a result of filing an appeal. Although we found those who believe that they are entitled to a more serious increase, and are ready to prove it. We hope that the matter is not in the installation, lowered to all the appeal commissions, but in the fact that we did not search well.

Single State exam as a compulsory one has existed for more than a decade, but despite this it remains a serious test of knowledge gained in the subject and psychological stability. Each point counts here, and getting the desired profession and the future depends on it. Disappointing results often seem incontrovertible, but they are not. Every graduate has the right to appeal. This is a serious event for which you need to carefully prepare, including mentally.

The essence of the appeal

This is an appeal examination test, which were determined by experts. The goal is to increase the points that the graduate expects when applying. It must be drawn up within two days from the date of receipt of the results.

Preparation

Careful preparation and review of your work in terms of compliance with the assessment criteria is the key to success. Make a list of tasks and, possibly, questions that you want to ask the members of the expert committee. Ask for help from a teacher or tutor in a particular subject.

Behavior rules

To understand how to behave, consider the stages of this event:

• the place and time of the meeting is appointed;
• come on the day of the procedure with a passport;
• parents can accompany you as legal representatives of a minor;
• your work is checked again, then the discussion begins;
• you are asked questions on those tasks, the verification of which does not suit you;
• answer them using weighty arguments (textbooks or manuals with theoretical material on the required topic).

You need to come prepared: work out in advance (on your own or with a teacher) all objections regarding work, be confident in your knowledge that you have to demonstrate. Therefore, we do not recommend starting this if you yourself doubt them.

It is possible and even necessary to win a small position of the commission appearance. Adhere to strictness in clothes, you should not look defiant and untidy.

The right attitude and style of behavior will also play a positive role in the appeal process. First of all, yours will be important here. Don't take this meeting as last battle, which must be won at any cost. Get a good night's sleep the night before, don't get overly nervous, and remember that everything that seems extremely important and significant now will be a trifle in a few years. Don't let any numbers throw you off balance.

Remain calm and balanced, be polite and courteous. Standing up for yourself and the results of the exam by using accusations, increased tone, and perhaps even screams and tantrums in your speech will not only give you nothing, but will not make the best impression. After that, you will no longer have to hope for a successful outcome in your own favor. Prove your point of view calmly and reasonably, without unnecessary objections and emotions.

Be polite: be sure to say hello warmly, and at the end also say goodbye, regardless of the outcome. Keep the dialogue in a businesslike way: be interested, ask questions that concern you, ask experts to explain what is likely to be incomprehensible. Of course, you can argue if you can’t do without it when arguing, but it’s important to do it as tactfully as possible, without being rude.

How to get a grade increase

If your appeal is denied, the scores previously assigned will remain unchanged. If it is satisfied, then their number changes. Keep in mind that rechecking can lead to their reduction if it turns out that some of the criteria were not met or you cannot convincingly argue one or another aspect of the work.

The mark is usually raised if a so-called technical error was made (this applies to the test part). For the part that involves a detailed answer, it is more difficult to achieve an increase in points. To do this, you must have a strong evidence base and the ability to defend your position using all the arguments. Keep in mind that experts raise the rating infrequently and rather reluctantly. Thus, they have to admit, in a certain sense, their own incompetence. But it's still worth a try. We wish you good luck if you decide to do it!

In case of disagreement with the points set for the exam, the annulment of the assessment results, the illegal removal of the child from the exam, the parents - and the student himself - can file an appeal.

Let's consider what is the procedure for appealing scoring results, when and how you can challenge the received document. You will also learn what the practice of the Russian courts is on this issue - and which side the judges take.

In what cases can an appeal be filed for the exam - deadlines for filing an appeal

A student undergoing the Unified State Exam procedure can challenge the decision of the commission, but the deadlines for applying and filing an appeal are different.

We list when and in what cases a student can appeal a decision.

Recall , that the student should have been informed 2 weeks before the exam about how the passing procedure will take place, in what time it will be possible to appeal the decision, in what place.

It will not work in any way to challenge the decision of the commission if the student or parent wants to emphasize the incorrect content of the test tasks, the incorrectness of the child filling out the forms, the student's non-compliance with the requirements set by the members of the commission.

The procedure for appealing the USE in case of violation of the rules for conducting the Unified State Exam - instructions

In order to challenge the decision of the commission, if the child was illegally kicked out of the exam - or the procedure for conducting the Unified State Exam was violated for some other reason, you must follow the instructions:

Step 1. After submitting the forms, going out into the corridor, the student must contact the organizer.

Step 2 Explain that you want to appeal, state the reason.

Step 3 Ask for an application form. If the organizers will stand their ground - to persuade you not to write an appeal, do not listen to them. If you think you have been illegally kicked out of passing the exam, then it is better to write an appeal immediately. Then it will not be considered.

Step 4 Write a statement. In it, be sure to indicate for what reason the USE procedure was violated. Prepare two copies of the application.

Step 5 Give the organizer one copy of the application and keep the other for yourself, but only ask the teacher to sign it. This will serve as proof of your appeal.

Step 6 Wait for the results of the commission - they will be ready within 2 days. The student and parents may be invited to the meeting of the commission. You should have your passport with you.

Results of the conflict commission can be obtained at the school where the child is studying.

The decision must be written in the documentation, as well as the date and time of the retake of the exam.

How to challenge the results of the exam in case of disagreement with the points obtained for the exam - instructions

To challenge the points already received, parents, or the student himself, must follow the following instructions:

Step 1. Contact educational institution where you study.

Step 2 Ask for an appeal form.

Step 3 Write a statement. It must be in the name of the director.

Step 4 Ask to sign the document. One option the parent or student must keep for themselves in order to have proof of their conversion. The other one should be given to the director.

Step 5 Wait for the committee's decision. The director must submit the application-appeal to the conflict commission. The date of the event can be communicated to the student if his presence is required.

As a rule, the application is considered quickly - within 1 week. After receiving the documentation, the student will either be assigned a retake day, or will increase / decrease the score results, or retain the existing scores.

The procedure for considering an appeal to the exam and terms

The procedure for considering applications for appealing the results of the exam is as follows:

1. The organizers must accept the student's appeal.
2. The application is submitted to the conflict commission, which does not include members of the subject commission.
3. If necessary, the participants of the conflict committee send a request to the RCOI of a certain object of the Russian Federation to provide information about the student passing the exam. Videos, audio recordings, copies of protocols and other paper documentation may be submitted for consideration.
4. The conflict commission must check how the student's examination work was assessed, according to all the requirements, and make a decision.

IMPORTANT: Parents or students may be invited to the meeting. They may be provided with an answer sheet filled out by the graduate to confirm that it was the applicant who did the work. Also, members of the subject committee may be invited to the meeting to establish the correctness of the assessment of the student.

The student will be able to receive the decision of the commission within 4 days at the school where he is studying.

Judicial practice of appealing the results of the exam - how and when can you file a lawsuit?

After contacting the conflict commission, if the decision is not satisfactory, the student or his legal representatives can file a claim with the court.

Terms for applying not defined by law.

Of course, the sooner the claim is filed, the better. The child will have time to retake the exam this year.

In practice, judges do not always take the side of the students.

Here are a few examples where the court agreed with the decision of the conflict commission:

Example 1 Petrov was kicked out of the exam due to cheating. Violations have been proven.

Example 2 Sokolova used a wrist watch with the function of receiving and transmitting data.

Example 3 Ivanov's cheat sheet fell out, but he was not caught cheating. Later, a video was sent, which showed how Ivanov was cheating.

And here are examples when parents and a graduate achieved recognition of their innocence:

Example 1 Sidorov was next to someone else's phone - he was lying on the floor when the student went to the toilet. The organizer demanded to pick up his phone, but Sidorov refused - he said that it was not his device. The organizer expelled the graduate from the exam - thus, he was wrong.

How to appeal the exam? This question was asked more than once by each applicant, since sometimes even one point can decide the fate budget place. How to properly defend your position? How long can this be done and what part of the work can be complained about?

Appeal to the exam: the structure of the work, the appealed parts

So, before you start thinking about getting additional points, you need to study in detail the structure of the examination paper. The exam itself consists, as a rule, of three sections: the first two are test tasks(selection of one correct answer and answers from a sequence of numbers / phrases), the third is the written part. The USE score is summed up taking into account all three chapters of the work - this is the so-called primary score, which is then translated using a complex formula into a secondary one in a hundred-point system. It should be noted right away that an appeal can only be filed against written part work, that is, tasks related to the detailed response of the graduate. How to do it right? Now we will analyze in detail all the possible nuances.

How to appeal the exam: an algorithm of actions

So, the appeal can be filed within two days from the date of the official announcement of the results. So there is no need to rush into this. As a rule, each classroom should inform the graduates about the point of filing a complaint and the time. If this has not been done, then after the completion of the examination work, you need to approach the chief expert of the exam site and clarify these data. It is also worth asking teachers in advance how this kind of application is submitted. In general, you need to go to such a commission with a teacher or with a tutor.

How to appeal the exam? Complaints of this kind are very often filed for the third part of the obligatory Russian language exam, since unaccounted examples or incorrectly defined problems are very common in the essay. That is why, immediately after submitting the work, you need to sketch out an approximate text of the work on a sheet and take it to the teacher or tutor, who must analyze this essay and, after the results are announced, say whether there is a chance to increase your score or not. The same applies to work in other subjects. You need to sketch your answers or decisions in order to be prepared in the commission and be able to answer any question and defend your point of view, since the experts sitting there are not always friendly. Now you know how to appeal the exam and what you need to do.

Causes a lot of criticism in Lately: these are scandals with the placement of answer options on the network, and an unworthy level of the work itself. How to deal with this, if every year there are more and more questions? The Ministry of Education is probably doing everything possible to equalize the chances of the applicants. It is for this that you need to strictly know how to appeal the exam and what is needed in order to get additional points, which, perhaps, will decide the difficult fate of the applicant.